In 1993 the
Oslo agreements were marked with the historic handshake between Yitzhak Rabin
and Yasser Arafat on the White House lawn.
Israel agreed to withdraw from defined areas of the West Bank and Gaza
and to allow elections to take place to enable a Palestinian Authority to have
some degree of autonomy. At the time the
population in Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories was
282,000. Today it is over 500,000.
Israeli
Government policy has encouraged the expansion of settlements in the West Bank although
this expansion is recognised to be illegitimate under international law by the United
States, EU and UK government. It is claimed that settlements
restrict Palestinian movement to such an extent that they now call into
question the viability of the two-state solution.
The faith-based groups in the UK supporting this report are Christian Aid, Quakers and the Methodist Church. They are
asking for national governments within the EU to make the importation of
settlement produce illegal. Meanwhile,
in the short term, we are calling for the labelling guidance on Israeli
settlement produce that has been introduced by the UK and Denmark to be
extended across the EU. This enables consumers to determine, in the case of
products originating from the West Bank, whether a product has been sourced
from Israeli settlements or from Palestinian areas. The Methodist Church in Britain endorses this report in line with Methodist Conference resolutions that have called for progress towards peace and justice in the region and the avoidance of goods sourced from settlements. The agencies supporting this report do not support a general boycott of Israel.
I have previously mused on the roles that the EU
might play today in supporting a durable solution in Israel/Palestine. This focus on trade with settlements
represents one possible contribution from the EU which is Israel’s largest
single trading partner. Trade with Israel and Palestine should
continue to be a force for increased understanding and co-operation. A refusal to trade with illegal settlements would
send the strong signal that the EU views adherence to international law as one vital
aspect in achieving justice and resolution to conflict.